Archive for the ‘Basic Instinct’ Category
Basic Instinct, Part 11: Mastery over the human race
The female instinct to survive that causes the woman to override her basic instinct to have her eggs fertilized, resulted in the female submitting to the new male even when she was not in heat. This new way of life resulted in women having two men in their lives as sexual mates: a condition that all women detest instinctually, even though they may live with it.
The two males in every woman’s life was a male in the workplace controlling her income and a male she married at home. Both men using the same woman for sex. One man in the workplace using her for sexual gratification and the other man using her for sexual impregnation.
Retraining the modern woman’s brain to survive became the driving force of knowledge forcing her to submit to multiple males. She would have to choose the one and reject the other; or love the one and hate the other. This new form of education forced both men and women to hate marriage. Divorce, promiscuity, and betrayal, was now the new way of life.
Ultimately, husbands concluded women cannot be faithful and became unwilling to marry or remain faithful in marriage. The wife concluded that she must redesign her own brain to deal with her new way of life, which includes multiple male partners to remain in control of her own existence and sanity, resulting in her unwillingness to marry, and her unwillingness to bear children.
This led many women to kill their own babies either by murder or abortion, and to become promiscuous to justify earning more money by having many male partners. Her new problem is the removal of guilt.
Now that women were seduced by their governments into abandoning their nests and children for the job and money, it would be easy to seduce women to abandon their husbands, even if their abandonment was only a temporary fling and kept secret. The watering-down of a man’s traditions, morals, beliefs, and mental instincts had begun, because the woman was now being fertilized by strangers even though she was married.
Let the murderers, rapists and thieves begin! Rulers had finally found a way to achieve mastery over the human race, and no one could revolt or stop it because it is a well-guarded secret.
Now you know why the government backs science in the pursuit of methods and products designed to free women from producing children. Now you know why the government forces children to learn about sex. And now you know why the people’s state of affairs concerning the family is in total disarray.
It was imperative for the government to find a way to release women’s guilt derived from them having multiple male partners and the guilt of the results of the many unwanted children from many male partners. Women have been trained and educated not to want children. Child bearing interferes with a woman’s freedom: her right to choose a male partner; her right to earn a living; a right over her own health — these are just a few new ideas programmed into the brains of women. Instinct gave her no such rights, but rulers gave her these rights for their own selfish purposes and greed.
Understanding the basic instinct of the male and female human being only unravels the basic reasons behind bad marriages, divorce, male and female promiscuity, disease, crime and evil acts. Human behavior is further complicated by external and internal conditions.
External conditions include the mentality of a nation, the variations of religious mentality, and the personal dreams of each person imposed on them by the media such as music and films, but the greatest of all external conditions imposed on people is buying and selling. Money is the center of this condition.
To be continued…
Basic Instinct, Part 10: The plot to replace men
Women living in a monogamist society eventually stray from a marriage, while men stray quickly. Most men and women hold out for a decade or two, but thinking cannot overpower instinct. When a woman is young, approximately 10 or 12 years of age, she comes into puberty. Men are a couple of years behind women. This is not a mistake of nature. It dictates that females cannot be fertilized by boys of the same age, because they have not matured sufficiently to pass on strong genes.
This sets in motion a law that only older males having proved their survival skills can collect females. Remember, the female wants the strongest, smartest male to fertilize her. She instinctively knows which male has learned to survive by his age. It dictates he has learned to survive. His knowledge gathered over his lifespan will pass on to her offspring. These female instincts insure the continuance of a strong species that will survive.
While the male selects young strong females to produce his offspring to insure he gets his genes into the world. Yet, the rulers are imposing new ways of disrupting nature. Through sex education, tolerance of misbehavior, tolerance of misguided sex practices, through media training of the masses, and through manipulation by using chemicals, children are being trained and redesigned to become sexually active at ever increasing younger ages.
Societies have allowed younger and younger males to grab-up the females close to their own age. Thus, removing the older males from the gene pool available for younger women, because these older men possess the survival knowledge that only comes with age. Survival knowledge the rulers fear and do not want passed on to children.
Producing new generations of children less able to survive and more easily convinced to do things the way the State demands. Thus, controlling employees by ignorance of survival, which is a threat to rulers remaining in power.
Taking the basic instinct of the female, which is to have her eggs fertilized, we see the only reason a woman needs a man. The rulers must act swiftly before the people become wise to their plot. In order for rulers to maintain control of their citizens, they must find a new method of controlling the people, before the people realize they have been deceived and used. Therefore, finding a new way to release the woman from her male is essential to maintaining their control over the new age slaves (employees).
Rulers’ ultimate goal is to replace the male with something else. The scientific quest for artificial insemination and cloning is that attempt to replace the male. The reason for this is to increase the working slaves (employees) for the rulers. Originally this was achieved during World War II. The government removed most men from their homes, wives, children, and their workplaces, for the war effort.
The idea was to convince women that the nation needed them to replace their husbands who went off to war; and that women could learn to do the work as well as their husband’s did; and to teach women they could earn sufficient money and be free from the enslavement of their husbands.
Thus, in one stroke of genius, the government devised a plan giving women a taste of earning their own money, being free of husbands, and shedding their responsibilities at home. The government achieved their goal to wean women away from their nests–their homes, children, while doubling the workforce of employees in the future, and releasing children from the direct training done by mothers so the State could now retrain the kids to change.
We are living in that future, and the result is fatal!
Once this was achieved, women would seek their freedom from their male watchdogs, throwing women’s lives open to managerial raping of wives and daughters, who volunteered their bodies reluctantly to keep their jobs. Instinctual female promiscuity was then triggered by a perception in women that the stronger male had replaced their dominant male husbands, because the boss controlled their provision through salaries earned. Things women were never designed to experience.
While the woman was designed to be loyal to the mate of her choice, she was also designed with the ability to shift that loyalty away from the mate of her choice, if he were overthrown by a stronger male. Thus, the workplace became the new territory she chose to enter, and thereby automatically gave the bosses control over his female employees.
This new territorial boundary replaced the male husband’s territory known as the home. It released the woman’s instinct for provision and protection of her nest and her children, by allowing a new dominant male to replace her husband by having sex with her.
To be continued…
Basic Instinct, Part 9: The western v. eastern mentality
Women are designed to go without sex for much longer periods of time than men. In the case of a pregnant human female, a ten month time period after fertilization is necessary before giving birth. During this time period most women do not want sex, but need consoling and protection. So, to get their male’s protection and consoling they are willing to give their man sex, but women hate it.
This limits a woman’s need for fertilization, and the lack of needing fertilization reduces the woman’s need for sex to zero. Not to mention the care period of a newborn child following birth, which for human females should be 2 years, but can be as long as 25 years depending on the female’s self-imposed limitations because of not breeding.
The care period of a newborn child should not be longer than 2 years, but thinking has elongated this responsibility for men and women. If we take the 2 year period necessary for a woman to insure the survival of her offspring, and add it to the 10 month period from fertilization to birth, then we have a period of 2 years and 10 months the woman instinctively will not need further fertilization.
In the case of monogamy, what is the male who is also driven by his instincts supposed to do? Remember, the instincts of the male demands fertilizing women every day. It is what he was designed to do, just as women were designed to be impregnated.
As you can see, this imposes an extreme problem on monogamist societies, of which none actually exist on earth, because men subsidize their monogamist marriages with girlfriends, mistresses and prostitutes.
While Western societies fake an existence rooted in monogamy, the truth is prostitution, mistresses, girlfriends and sometimes daughters, wouldn’t be used as mates if these societies were truly monogamist. Men in Western Societies mate with many more women during their lifetimes than they marry. Instinct rules! If instinct rules, then why are we Western nations based on monogamy?
The reason is simple. Rulers have learned over many ages that it is easier to enslave people who do not have 20 or 30 wives, resulting in 100 or more children, who are willing to fight any ruler threatening their family. Armed with this knowledge, you can understand why Muslims are a great threat to Western societies. Islam believes and allows a man to have multiple wives, producing many more children than Western men. It is the basic reason the Western Hemisphere cannot stop terrorism; and if the West threatens Islam’s way of life (polygamy), there will be a World War III.
A man who has 20 or 30 women as wives will be totally fulfilled instinctively because he will be fertilizing all the time and the three year period a woman does not need fertilization, and is out of action because of childbirth, will no longer interrupt the natural behavior of the male and his many females.
Neither are his women threatened, abused, or imprisoned, because they willingly desire these conditions, which also fulfill all their instincts.
Every man and woman wants their instincts fulfilled. Fulfilled instincts are the only way to achieve peace, satisfaction and sexual gratification. Neither our present Western societies, nor the Eastern Westernized societies, can accomplish this by imposing rules and laws upon its citizens to control their sexual behavior, which must result in individual misbehavior and the overthrow of nations by war. Therefore, women of ancient and modern societies are feeling imprisoned by men when it is the rulers who have imposed the conditions humans live under in civilization.
A woman cannot tell a man what she wants because she doesn’t know her instincts are ruling her, but she knows she needs to be free to follow her instincts. Not free of her male mate, but free from their rulers who have imposed monogamy on the human race for their own benefit, which is to acquire the wealth from the use of their citizens by controlling their slaves, now known as employees.
For it is cheaper to pay a prostitute by the hour for sex, than to pay for a wife over a lifetime. In the same way it is cheaper to pay for an employee by the hour, than to pay for a slave over his or her lifetime. Now you know why rulers have done away with slavery and replaced it with employment.
Now you know why rulers have done away with polygamy and replaced it with monogamy. Now you know why China and America have done away with childbirth (by murdering the woman’s reproductive organs and allowing a woman to murder her child by abortion, and allowing a woman the right over her own body to keep it from reproduction).
To be continued…
Basic Instinct, Part 8: The problem with monogamy
One of the strongest drives taught to men and women early in life is to seek the approval of our peers and masters. When people fail in this arena, they develop a low self esteem or a hatred for authority, amongst other neurosis. Knowing how life is supposed to work, and how it was originally designed to work, is the basis of ridding oneself of these neuroses.
Torment is not a mental disease, even though it occurs in the brain. Wild animals are not tormented, but caged animals are tormented. Animals imprisoned by man, or living amongst man, display various stages of torment. Yet, domestic animals like dogs and cats freely accept their imprisoned status, as most women also accept their imprisoned status.
Men, whether women believe it, are also prisoners of society. Their prison cells might be larger, but that ends any difference between male and female imprisonment and torment.
In the wild, the female chooses which clan’s territory to join. She is fully aware of enslaving herself to the male in charge of the territory. She has freely chosen to become a part of that man’s life. Once her choice is made, she loses all rights to making choices. Her male dominates her.
The female instinct allows her to desire this condition. In fact, she hungers to be dominated by her male. Without her male’s domination, she is miserable. Without children, women are confused. Unless another male overthrows the superiority of her male, she will contently spend her entire life with her male. This is because wild animals are only using instinct to direct their lives.
If her male is overthrown by another male, she is designed to submit to her new male freely, which behavior is exhibited in modern women on a daily basis, because women are designed to accept the new dominant male, which their instinct perceives is the guy controlling their workplace, the bar, or the gym.
Since the male is designed to fertilize the female whenever she comes into heat, females often stray from the husband due to a new male being on location when they go into heat at another location, other than the home.
Another natural law in the male is designed to fertilize women many times per day, while the female is not designed for such activity except when she goes into heat, which only occurs sporadically in any given year. Therefore, we see another natural law. Men can fertilize ten to twenty women in one day, every day; while a woman will only allow a man to fertilize her during her period of heat, which may only occur once a month.
This female limitation, imposed upon her by nature, imposes a strain upon her male mate in a monogamist society, because the male can fertilize at least ten to twenty women per day. Has nature made a mistake? No! It seems to be a mistake, but is not a mistake. It is a purposeful plan imposed upon the lower classes of the human race by the ruling class of a nation in civilization. Rulers have constructed laws limiting the male to one female.
A nation’s law limiting males to one female is the basis of the male not having the availability of many females to fertilize; and the females not having one male to fertilize many women, when they come into heat. This causes another problem in civilization.
Many women never get a male to fertilize them, or worse, women wind-up being fertilized by a male that cannot, nor will not, bear their responsibility to care of that female. Leaving her to the mercy and scarcity of providing for herself and her children.
Now mathematically speaking, simple logic shows us that if a female only requires the services of her male mate one day per month, then the number of females that will require the same male’s services during that month would be at least thirty females; and they would solely belong to him.
This logic is based upon the thirty females coming into heat on different days during the same month, but many females in one herd can come into heat on the same day; and many other females can come into heat on different days of the month.
Now if the male can service ten to twenty different women each day, every day, then we can multiply the minimum ten women a day by the thirty days of a month culminating in a harem of at least three hundred women for one male. Then it is necessary to figure in the supplies needed by the one male to provide for his females, and you can begin to see why a male would have to be a king, like King Solomon in the Bible, to provide for his 300 wives and 700 concubines.
Showing us that a normal number of females owned by one male should be a minimum of 300 females. Not to mention the joy of a female, who does not have to perform sexually every day for her monogamist male as the sole female trying to satisfy his sexual appetite: which sexual appetite’s demands on the sole wife are considered as another form of enslavement; and not to mention the fact that women desire the company of other women and never desire the company of men, but only need men for fertilization.
Now you can see why monogamy (one man and one woman) cannot work, even though some people are die-hards and remain married for a lifetime.
To be continued…
Basic Instinct, Part 7: The sexual drive
Now let’s begin to dissect female behavior. Remember the question, What do women want? Like Sigmund Freud, I have personally asked thousands of women the same question during many hours of research I personally conducted. The only answer I ever received from a woman was, “I do not know.”
The reason women don’t know what they want is, women have not successfully adapted to civilization as men have adapted. Women operate their bodies and their lives mostly according to their instincts. While almost all of the male’s instincts have been replaced by society’s laws because of fear. Therefore we can state: In women, instinct rules!
This is not true for the male, except in one area – sex! When it comes to sex, men are totally locked into using their basic instinct. This is why men have no boundaries concerning the female when it comes to sex. Age, height, color, race, religion, weight, good, and evil, are usually not considerations of a male when it comes to sex. Yet, like the female, he has certain conditions imposed on him by instinct, which he readily discards in the face of no sex.
The mental conditions imposed on men by society oppose his basic instinct. When a society imposes rules concerning the ownership and use of women, it results in perversions. This is the basic reason a male shepherd alone for months with the herd of sheep will commit bestiality. All bringing us back on course, as to why people exhibit bad behavior.
Both male and female are driven by their basic instinct to both fertilize and be fertilized, but when their natural instincts are forbidden or altered, both men and women resort to perversion. The shepherd would have never committed bestiality if he had a female; and if needing money had not driven the shepherd to be alone tending a flock of sheep to make money; and if the shepherd remained in the natural wild state tending his family instead of sheep.
Another scenario to discuss is the reason for the female’s promiscuity. While some females become celibate even after marriage, others embark on a road of promiscuity. Both types of women, and all degrees in between, are victims of a single concept. We began to think!
Humans know we are the only “thinking” species on this planet. While all wildlife has the ability to think, no animal can use thinking to analyze to the degree learned by Mankind. Men have mastered learning by recording data. Human beings are unique for this reason alone. While most people believe humans are superior to animals, the truth is thinking and analyzing has made us inferior to all other life. Thinking has caused the human species to self-destruct and destroy other animals. I don’t have to prove this fact. The proof is available to everyone today!
Thinking is a process imposed upon us. From birth, our parents and communities force us to learn. Unlike other animals, who teach their young the basic survival tools for a short time after birth, humans impose a one-third life sentence upon their children called education. Survival for the human species no longer depends solely on food, water and air, but encompasses complexities that will take the average person 30 to 40 years to accumulate and never master.
If all animals are born with the necessary instincts to survive life, why was it necessary for mankind to add thinking and analyzing to his brain? This question demands an answer, without which no person can ever find peace during life. If a person achieves “peace” while alive, it will be his or her greatest achievement. Mastering survival brings peace.
Torment is the opposite of peace. Torment is self-imposed. Torment comes from either within our own brain or from outside the brain. In either case, information is entering the brain causing conflict with our instincts. All people suffer from some degree of torment, but some people suffer great torment. Torment ranges from slight to extreme. We have labeled these degrees of torment: anxiety, jealousy, depression, mistrust, and insanity, are a few labels. Other labels include: whore, adulterer, pimp, thief, murderer, and rapist. The list is almost endless.
Yet, all these labels merely identify a degree of torment going on inside the brain of the person being tormented, which torment is revealed by a person’s outward behavior.
To be continued…
Basic Instinct, Part 6: Man’s ownership of his family
In an ancient society, men beat their wives physically or just killed them. This rude behavior sometimes led to the murder of the woman, whereas, in modern societies, men at best tolerate their misbehaving wives, or female partners, or daughters, until they decide to no longer tolerate them. The result of deciding not to tolerate them is either abuse, divorce or abandonment.
Once a modern man reaches his threshold of tolerance, several results are possible. The most extreme result is he murders the woman and possibly her children. The least extreme is he leaves the woman and most times abandons the entire family including his own children. In either case, ancient or modern, this behavior does not depend on actual facts. It is imposed on the female mostly based on perception.
It doesn’t matter to a male whether or not evidence exists. He only has to perceive it exists. This brings us to the next level of trying to understand human behavior.
Why would a man kill the mother of his own children? Why would a mother kill her own children?
Well, one basic reason is: The male can never be sure the children are his; while the woman must get rid of the children to move onto the next male! When we were animals, instinctively males and females procreated and didn’t care whether or not the child belonged to them, because we lacked the power of thinking and analyzing. This idea of owning the child is a precursor to the idea of owning the woman.
If a man owns the woman, then he owns his children. If ownership didn’t exist women would be free, but ownership does exist.
Governments produce the laws that protect the ownership of assets. No one tolerates the stealing of an auto or goods. Yet, nothing protects a man’s ownership of his wife and children. The proof of ownership is the production of children. The ownership of a man’s family was once highly regarded as sacred and protected by law. Today so called tolerant societies look the other way when a wife steals her husband’s children, or another male steals a man’s wife.
This is a very real problem, because instinct forces men to react. Once a woman freely chooses a male for sex, he is overwhelmed by the instinct of ownership; and once the instinct of ownership kicks-in, the brain’s thoughts take over and convince the man of his ownership. In the same way you own your car, he owns his woman and her children. It doesn’t matter whether she is legally his wife, mistress or daughter. Therefore, only he can release her from this bond. In the same way he alone can sell his car.
Now the modern woman hates this fact, and in doing so, she hates the natural order of things, and is therefore rebelling against nature. Rebelling against nature only brings natural laws into play that are costly. A man’s method of releasing her can take on any number of ways. This is the reason fathers give away the bride.
Father’s are men relinquishing their ownership of their daughters to another male for the purpose of sexual reproduction. There are cases of men temporarily relinquishing their ownership of daughters, girlfriends, and wives, such as: men renting their women to other men for the purpose of earning money for sex.
Yes, some men will let their wives or women go with other men or women even for the purpose of self-gratification. We call these men pimps and the women prostitutes. Yet, their behavior is the result of rules imposed upon them, which rules have altered natural life by imposing money as a necessity to buy food and the things that once belonged to the human race and were free for the taking.
As we discuss the male’s behavior, which at times can be extremely dangerous, keep in mind that throughout the ages the male has had to impose rules on the female because of knowledge being acquired and added to the brain. Knowledge of new things occurring in the human exchange of a society has changed the behavior of men and women, while the knowledge of instinct is mostly lost and unknown to us today.
To be continued…
Basic Instinct, Part 3: The reproduction of the human race
Men are also prone to inflict their misguided knowledge upon women, willing to allow their female instincts to dictate reproduction, by not allowing the female to produce children. Men’s reasons are also many, the least of which is children cost too much money. Other reasons include the male’s only reason for marrying are: to have a live-in female for sexual use only; adding a female by marriage for the purpose of increasing his available income; to have a female because she was the only female that would have ever slept with him; to cover-up his being a homosexual; to trade his female with other men for the use of their females; to sell his female to other men; to be a mother to them; to be their own personal live-in maid… and on – and on – and on!
The entire problem can be reduced to its singular source, which is the fertilization of the female human egg or the necessity for reproduction. The male and female of all species are instinctually designed for this one act so life can continue. The necessity for reproduction forces us to realize that basic instincts #1 and #2, namely
1. The instinct to survive, and
2. The instinct to find food and water
are actually integral parts of the composite instinct #3 to reproduce the human race.
This then reduces the entire meaning of life to one singular instinct and only one reason for living, the reproduction of the human race; and anything that interrupts or tries to supplant this essential act undermines the course of all good human behavior, resulting in bad behavior of every degree.
Males and females do not know why they are driven to think and act. They do not have a clue to the essential reason their own behavior at times disturbs them. Ancient man didn’t understand this essential behavior either, but over thousands of years learned as he progressed. He learned the female could not be trusted to think and act by herself. So societies around the world developed by imposing strict laws governing the human female’s actions.
Once Mankind released the human brain to add information and knowledge, the problems created would become insurmountable: demanding thousands of remedies and laws added to the game of life for human beings. This is the reason all human beings on earth realize our societies do not work, which only bring misery and loss no matter what race, color, creed, class or the geographical location of a person’s nation.
Some of older societies still linger today, trying to impose ancient remedies on female behavior. One such community is the Muslim peoples. In the more antiquated countries like Algeria, women are literally imprisoned in their own homes in a vain attempt to control their behavior. Another is China, which has imposed the deliberate destruction of a woman’s reproductive organs to reduce her ability to have more than one child. The greatest offender was Ancient Rome, whose laws are still affecting today’s Western nations. The ancient Roman Empire imposed laws limiting men to one woman: thus, reducing the number of children born in one family by reducing the number of women available to one man.
No matter what solution imposed by nations upon the human race, the societies may limit reproduction, but the destructive consequences range from abuse to serial killers. The mentality of an entire nation teaches women lies to deceive and convince women to stop reproducing because it is necessary to preserve their standard of living or by using religion to limit men’s natural instincts. Whether or not this is taught directly or indirectly is of no importance. The results shout that Mankind has interfered with the natural order of things, creating a zoo of crime, disease, misery, and untold bad results.
Leave a Comment
Leave a Comment
Leave a Comment
RSS - Posts